This post summarizes three typical simple sorting algorithms: bubble sort, selection sort, and insertion sort. In chapter 7, MAW mainly talks about insertion sort but for the sake of completeness, I will include the other two as well ^{1}.
Bubble sort
Concept
The idea for the bubble sort is to "bubble" larger elements to the end of array by comparing \(i\) and \(i+1\), and swapping if \(A[i] > A[i+1]\). We repeat this from the first to the end of unsorted part of the array.
The following code demonstrates the actual algorithm
#define SWAP(a,b) {int t; t = a; a = b; b = t;}
void bubbleSort(int A[], int n)
{
int i, j;
for(i = 0; i < n; i++) // n passes thru the array
for(j = 1; j < (ni); j++) // from start to the end of unsorted part
if(A[j1] > A[j]) SWAP(A[j1], A[j]);
}
The key for the alogorithm is that we only do the "bubble up" operation for the unsorted part. The following gives an example of the algorithm in action:
 index  0  1  2  3  4  5 
 original  34  8  64  51  32  21 

 pass 0  8  34  51  32  21  64 
 pass 1  8  34  32  21  51  64 
 pass 2  8  32  21  34  51  64 
 pass 3  8  21  32  34  51  64 
 pass 4  8  21  32  34  51  64 
 pass 5  8  21  32  34  51  64 
Analysis
Bubble sort is stable and in place. The running time is \(O(N^2)\), which is true for both worst case and average case. \(O(N)\) can be achieved in the best case, where the array is sorted or mostly sorted (possible a few elements a place or two away from their correct spots).
Selection sort
Concept
The idea for selection sort is to scan array and select small key and swap it with the first element of the array (i.e. \(A[0]\)); scan remaining keys, select the smallest and swap with the second element (i.e. \(A[1]\)); repeat the whole process until last element is reached. In other words, after \(i\)th pass, first \(i\) elements are sorted and in proper position.
Like the bubble sort, we divide the whole array into sorted part and unsorted part: we start with unsorted array and keep the sorted array at the beginning. Each time we scan the unsorted part of the array and decide which element should go next into the sorted part. However, unlike bubble sort, we build the sorted part from the beginning of the array (in bubble sort, we start with moving the largest element to the end of array).
The following code demonstrates the actual algorithm
void
selectionSort(int A[], int N)
{
int i, j, min;
j = min = i = 0;
for(; i < N1; i++)
{
for(j = i; j < N; j++)
if(A[j] < A[min])
min = j;
swap(&A[min], &A[i]);
}
}
Here is an example of the algorithm in action:
 index  0  1  2  3  4  5 
 original  34  8  64  51  32  21 

 pass 0  8  34  64  51  32  21 
 pass 1  8  21  64  51  32  34 
 pass 2  8  21  32  51  64  34 
 pass 3  8  21  32  34  64  51 
 pass 4  8  21  32  34  51  64 
Analysis
The selection sort is NOT STABLE but in place. Selection sort is not sensitive to the input and thus running time should be the same in best, average, and worst cases: We go through \(N1\) passes with \(N1, \dots, 1\) comparisons, which is \(O(N^2)\).
Since selection sort is insensitive to the data, it's good if we want to have our sort routine always take the same time.
Insertion sort
Concept
The idea for insertion sort is that we insert an asyetunprocessed record into a sorted list of the records processed so far. In details, insertion sort consists of \(N1\) passes. For pass \(P = 1\) through \(N1\), insertion sort ensures that the elements in positions \(0\) through \(p\) are in sorted order. In pass \(P\), we move the element in position \(P\) left until its correct place is found among the first \(P+1\) elements.
The following code demonstrates the actual algorithm
void
insertionSort(int A[], int N)
{
int j, P;
int tmp;
for(P = 1; P < N; P++)
{
tmp = A[P];
for(j = P; j > 0 && tmp < A[j1]; j)
A[j] = A[j1];
A[j] = tmp;
}
}
Here is an example of the algorithm in action:
 index  0  1  2  3  4  5 
 original  34  8  64  51  32  21 

 pass 1  8  34  64  51  32  21 
 pass 2  8  34  64  51  32  21 
 pass 3  8  34  51  64  32  21 
 pass 4  8  32  34  51  64  21 
 pass 5  8  21  32  34  51  64 
Analysis
Due to the nested loops, the running time is \(O(N^2)\), which can be achieved when the input array is in reverse sorted order. In the best case, where the input array is already sorted, the running time is \(O(N)\). For the average case, the running time is \(O(N^2)\). In fact, the bound is tight for both average case and worst case: \(\Theta (N^2)\).
In addition, insertion sort is stable and in place. Insertion sort is the most effectively used on input array with roughly \(N < 20\) and for almost sorted array.
A Lower Bound for Simple Sorting Algorithms

An inversion is a pair of elements in wrong order (i.e. \(i < j\) but \(A[i] > A[j]\)).

Simple sorting algorithms presented in this post swap adjacenet elements (explicitly or implicitly) removes one inversion per swap. This makes the running time proportional to number of inversions in array.

The average number of inversions in an array of \(N\) distinct numbers is \(N(N1)/4\).

Any algorithm that sorts by exchanging adjacent elements requires \(\Omega (N^2)\) time on average. This is due to the fact that each adjacent swap removes only one inversion.
As you can tell, to break \(O(N^2)\) barrier, we must remove more than one inversion for each swap. Adjacent elements swap will certainly not help us to achieve this goal. The idea is that we try to swap the elements that are far apart and hopefully we can remove more than one inversion for each swap. Shell sort is the first algorithm to break \(O(N^2)\) running time. I'll talk about it in my next post.
Links to resources
Here are some of the resources I found helpful while preparing this article:
 MAW Chapter 7
 Sorting cheat sheet from Duke U.
 Lecture 15 from U.Washington
 Notes from MIT
 Lecture from U.Rochester

bubble sort video, selection sort video, insertion sort video and this animation can help you understand the concept. ↩